Erikson on Play Essay

In the Modern Theories lecture, all three theorists Freud, Vygotsky, and Piaget developed antithetical views on social good turn. Erik Eriksons go possible action is similar to Vygotsky because Erikson viewed play as a necessary factor for social development. My extra credit paper is everywhere the modern theorists. During the class lecture, I larn that Erik Erikson researched how the ego is the childs personality and is responsible for a unified sense of self. Cognition and play was Piagets focus Vygotsky researched a childs ZPD development.Bruner researched his idea on problem solving. However, play is more manner of operative taboo personality formation a way of savvy and interpreting what a child is feeling. All three theorists were social researchers. However, Erik Erikson was most noted for his work in refining and expanding Freuds possible action of stages. He found bug out that adults do not play because they have reached the superego stage. Anna Freud and Lili Pel ler were two researchers who found out that play is a way of working out traumas and it is a basis of play therapy.Lili Peller researched how play is wish fulfillment children have desires that they cannot fulfill, however, they play it out. Kids be working out their issues through toys. Play is a way of working out personality issues and understanding/interpreting how a child is feeling. Play is also a key feature of socialization. Corsaro developed the type of vocalisation reflects social status and creates social status. According to Gregory Bateson, the language of play is important children give each other signals that play is going on.Bateson found out that the received and the unreal was not the here-and-now and the not present. Bateson agreed with others about what is going on. Children also create a frame where play takes place they step in and out of the frame using codes, signals and cues. Bateson also discovered that children also step in and out of the play frame usi ng codes, signals and cues in as if activities. Millard Parten was the first chick to focus on how children progress in their social interactions in peers.Mildred Parten, Ph. D. ocused on Sociology (1929) her research focused on how children progress in their social interactions with peers. I learned and remember from the lecture that according to Erikson, children are able to self heal when they play it out where adults rag it out. In auto cosmic play play begins and centers on the childs own body. The childs play is the infantile form of the human ability to deal with experiences by creating model situations and to exceed reality by experiment and planning. Partens theory lead me to believe that the uninvolved stage was the first level of social play participation.I enjoyed read about Eriksons timeline of Auto cosmic, microsphere and large sphere was Eriksons theory on how children develop in psychological stages. Auto cosmic play is performing with your own body verses in wh ich infants play with their own bodies, and going on to a toy microsphere (the kind of play that is done with small toys), followed by the macro sphere the kind of play that is done between children of play with other children. Autocosmic MicrosphereMacrosphere play with body play with toys play with other children The diagram above is what I learned from the presentation.Corsaro researched how children communicate with each other and Language Serves as a way to form social groups and a hierarchy during play and talked about a type of utterance that reflects social status and creates social status during play called Social Play Talk I questioned how play is a way of working out a persons ideas on forming their own personality. Social play meant to me that it was one of the forms of a theorists ideas. Freud, Erikson, and Peller all influenced play therapy. I had a question about why Erikson found out that children had a trust vs mistrust stage when there was already an autonomy vs d oubt stage.Lev Vygotskys theory on the ZPD made the most sense to me. Erikson built on Freuds theory by elevating social factors over biological ones and Erikson also show the id as the key to personality development. My view on social development changed from broad to specific after I read the pages on Vygotskys theory of the zone of proximal development. I understood more of why Play creates a zone of proximal development of the child. I learned that the child has different levels of development in different functions in social play.My understanding of theory changed because I became more aware of what children do in a social play setting. Cat Garveys theories fit into what I observed in childs play because Garveys preparatory talk fits into Explicit Directions for pretend play. I understood that children need directions to do a task (word puzzle). Signals also factored into how children decide to play. I found that signals can be very helpful in understanding childrens play. My favorite play talk lead me to believe Garvey was identifying the way children can transform the environment (playhouse into kitchen) and nything they can enact on. The different ways that kids are using language to create the scenario. Boys do not really use prep talk girls are more likely to use prep talk lets play house. I did not see any theory that was not play related, however, Garveys play theory was non helpful in explaining other types of nonverbal play and games. Each theorists ideas were based off of their own philosophy and beliefs that play were relevant to childrens purpose and context in social development. I was impressed that the modern theorists had some idea to describe and understand childrens social experiences.