Cell Phones Do Not Cause Any Health Problems

In todays world, carrelular teleph peerless speech sounds atomic name 18 part of a life. As the technology improves more than than and more people argon buying booth skirts. M both new carrell knell resounds are like a sm every last(predicate) computer, as they keep a picture and boob tube camera, web browsing, music player, internal stor be on, and numerous a nonher(prenominal) features. Statistics state that 79% of the U. S. tribe and 90% of European and Asian teens give birth a carrell environ (OKeefe, 2008, p. 671). In some countries around the world such(prenominal) as Israel, Hong Kong, Italy, and the Czech Re unrestricted, on that point are more stall echos than people (Kohli, Sachdev, & Vats, 2009, p. ). In 1993, a man named David Raynard from Florida appeared on the Larry world-beater Live and accused a mobile call anticipate industry that his wife died be pass water of malignant neoplastic disease that was getd by a cadre the use. From that conviction mobile band knell ray has been one of main concerns to people (Park, 2001, p. 166), provided since because several studies establish proved that cadre phones do non cause any wellness problems. at that place are deuce types of radioactivitys, ionizing and non-ionizing. Ionizing beam consists of Gamma rays, X-Rays and ultraviolet radiation.Ionizing radiation has comely energy to damage the essence of atoms ca victimisation damage to DNA which could start to pitchs in chemical reactions in the personate (How Cell-phone shaft whole shebang, 2001). Cell phones function at 900 or 1800 MHz frequencies. These frequencies fall inside the same part of the radiation spectrum as the radios and televisions which are referred to intercommunicate relative frequency Radiation. radio receiver absolute frequency Radiation falls in the range of non-ionizing radiation (Kohli, Sachdev, & Vats, 2009, p. 6). Non-ionizing radiation consists of radio, television, kiosk phones, microwave, and visible light (How Cell-phone Radiation Works, 2001).Non- ionizing radiation has enough energy to change the energy levels of the electron, but doesnt rent enough energy to destroy or move any part of an atom. This causes change magnitude in heat level of the airfield that could be close to source of radiation. This states that RFR from carrelphoneular telephone phone does not harm the military man tissue from heat. Besides the heating of the tissues, in that respect are some other theories that guess extremely low absolute frequency magnetised fields might impress the toil of some antioxidants and/or stop the mathematical product of the chemicals that stop cadreular mutation.There is besides another theory that says low frequency electromagnetic fields change the organise of DNA, but these are just theories for right off (Kohli, Sachdev, & Vats, 2009, p. 6). For the electronic devices not to cause harm, the police force requires safety stan dards to situate and periodically modify the maximum amount of movie to intercommunicate relative frequency Radiation. Federal Communications explosive charge (FCC) has issued standards for world-wide public and works people. working people refers to those people who are working in an area where they are open(a) to Radio Frequency Radiation.Exposure limit for working people is senior high schooler than the general public, because working people are conscious(predicate) that they are being exposed to the radiation unlike the general public that is not aware of the movie and cannot avoid or settle the movie (Barnes, 1999, p. 21). The limit for word picture for working people is 0. 4W/kg and for the public is 0. 08W/kg. Effects of Radio Frequency Radiation from cell phone and cell phone stations are investigated by the sphere Health Organization (WHO). According to WHO, exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation from base stations is in reality only 0. 002% to 2% of the lev els of international exposure guidelines, lower or comparable to exposure from radio or television. (Kohli, Sachdev, & Vats, 2009, p. 7). WHO is alike dower the questioners to fully understand Radio Frequency Radiation exposure. There have umteen another(prenominal) searches that have been do trying to brass for a link surrounded by crabmeat and cell phone radiation. both(prenominal) studies have been do by collecting info from records and looking for any links betwixt cell phone and cancer. While other actually test at affect of cell phone on livelihood beings.These researches test to see how much radiation was absorbed and even after that if add-ons the chances of having health problems One of biggest researches include a try out that was done in Denmark. IT included a angle of dip of cell phone users that bid from January 1982 until December 1995. The appoint was obtained from the two cell phone companies that provided service to the user in the Denmark. The list also contained contact education of the cell phone users, and what kinds of cell phones they were using at that time. some(prenominal) of the users had to be excluded because in that location was not enough information to instigate the research. The final list had about (420,000 users) 80. 3 percent of users that were on the first list obtained from the cell phone companies. The median age for cell phone users was 37. 4 long time and 38. 4 years for female cell phone users. Another list was obtained from Danish Cancer Registry that was used to bump the heel of cancers from January 1982 to December 1995. The cancer list contained numerous different types of cancers including brain tumours and urinary tract papilloma that occurred to cell phone users.That list also separated depend on and five year groupings. Most of the cell phone users subscribed to the service during the years 1994 and 1995. Using the statistics from the cancer report, expected poem of cancers were p redicted. The results from the nurture showed that the purpose of cell phone did not improver the number of cancers to be found in male cell phone users. For female cell phone users the results were similar as males and did not show any increase in number of cancers.The number of people with brain cancer actually falld even when the number of cell phone users increased dramatically however in that respect was increase in a few types of cancer, but the increase showed no relationship between the cell phone and cancer. The test also showed decrease in lung cancer after 1992 because of the decrease in prices of cell phones in Denmark. The usage of cell phones showed decrease in lung cancer because users were more likely to use a cell phone than some cigarettes. Many young people were spending more money on cell phone rather than buying cigarettes.In result of this study, the results show no increase in any type of cancer that was link up to cell phone use. (Johansen, Boice, McL aughlin, & Olsen, 2001, p. 203-207). Another research was done in India to determine the neurologic effect of electromagnetic radiation propelted by cell phone, when cell phone is unplowed at different positions close to the body, by analysis of touchwood and soul rate disagreement (sample siemens and scaling exponent). The study included fourteen male aged between 24 and 46. Electrocardiogram was used for 30 minutes on each tender to obtain recordings with three different situations.The heart rate of the volunteers was also recorded during all three situations. First situation was to substantiate normal recordings without a call phone. guerilla situation was to have the cell phone in the left field pocket so that it is closer to the heart. In the third situation, the cell phone was placed near the left ear. A thirty-minute break was given between each recording. Dame cell phone was used for the recordings. The results determined sample entropy and scaling exponent indicate d an increase when cell phone was placed near the vanity and a decrease when cell phone is placed near the head.However, the differences were not that high enough when compared to recordings from without using a cell phone simple because cell phones emit very low power to cause any significant change to heart rate that can be detected. (Ahamed, Karthick, & Hoseph, 2008, p. 709-711). There have been several studies that found that cell phone radiation increases the encounter of cancer, but subsequently when some of those studies were studied again, it was state that cell phone radiation does not increase the lay on the line of cancer.A study in Australia in 1996 found that FM and TV towers increased the rates of leukemia in children, but in a later study it was determined that towers showed no increase of guess from the exposure. Two different studies were done in Sweden and found the increase in number brain tumours from cell phone radiation, but when the one of these studies was repeated, it found no increase in brain tumours. in one case again when the same study was done later on, it found increase of risk developing tumour. After International theatrical performance of Research in Cancer sponsored the research and no evidence was found that cause increase the risk of tumours. Kohli, Sachdev, & Vats, 2009, p. 8). The studies about cell phone radiation have many limitations that prevent them from completely accurate answers. several(prenominal) factors contribute to this such as in that respect are not that many researches that researched for more than ten years, documents that show amount of cell phone usage are perhaps to be twist, amount of Radio Frequency Radiation depends on type of cell phone and the location of the cell phone, and also it is almost impossible to test Radio Frequency Radiation exposure in an isolated area because there are always other objects emitting Radio Frequency Radiation.These types of limitations produce different ans wers sometimes to a study when it is repeated. It is possible for some researchers to bias to state their point. (Kohli, Sachdev, & Vats, 2009, p. 7). In conclusion, there been many researches trying to find the answer to cell phone radiation and its possible effects. Some state that there is an increase in risk of cancer and other health problems, however some researches state that there no increase in risk of cancer and other health problems. (Kohli, Sachdev, & Vats, 2009, p. 7).To have improved future researches, the studies should be longer, on-going for at least ten to xv years. There should be a study that is done throughout different countries in the world in both artless and urban areas. In my opinion, cell phone radiation does not increase the risk of any disease. If that was not the case hence anybody who uses a cell phone would already have brain tumour and there would been a dramatic decrease in population. For at least now I think there are enough studies that suppo rt the no increase in risk developing health problems and everyone should moot those studies.